An interesting question at best. I have heard from dozens of people who feel as I do - that Fidelity National Title Company was terrific during the escrow and closing process...............
but when a problem occurred with the property their was absolutely no one their to help the insured. The claims counsel assigned to the claim was not their to assist the claimant, the insured, but rather was there to represent Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and their shareholders - of which the company take pride in the fact that the employees are shareholders. To me this is a conflict in interest as the more claims that are not paid - the more valuable the shares of Fidelity National Title become.
Additionally, which is not apparent at first, all of the communication and the distances of the Fidelity National Title employees and people they hire such as the appraiser are designed to make suing them difficult and expensive and inaccessible.
My advise for working with a company like Fidelity National Title Insurance Company is to get everything in writing. When something is not clear push hard for clarity - in writing. When you receive a generic legalize type letter push hard for clarity - in writing.
I believe the treating of claims is completely hidden from the insureds when they purchase their title insurance. There is no one there to truly represent your interests in your property - at least there was not in my case. The claims counsels were there to represent the bottom profit line of Fidelity National Title.
I would never use Fidelity National Title Insurance Company to protect my real estate. A claim was filed with Fidelity for me by their Title Officer for the loss of a mile long easement to 80 acres with views of the famous Napa Valley in California. Fidelity valued the loss at $0 by a Boise Idaho appraiser. After suing Fidelity I was forced to settle for a fraction of the loss. I question whether Fidelity National Title Insurance Company acted in Good Faith in the handling of my claim.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Saturday, October 26, 2013
And Yet Another Claimant Heard From
....and once again - the title company is not making an admission of being in the wrong and yet they are willing to pay something (I did advise against just using their appraissal as they will just low ball the problem in my experience) - but here is another good example of how confusing the process is and how the claims counsel does not truly appear to be there for the client/customer/us.
Under the policy, the measure of loss is the difference, if any, in the value of the property with and without the issues in question. Although we do not concede that there are claims or rights to the property that were not excepted from coverage, we have opted to determine the diminution in value attributable to the paved driveway and the underground storm drain. If you have any ideas of what you believe the loss to be, then please let me know. Otherwise, I will retain an appraiser to evaluate the property and provide a value.
Thank you,
"Just got an email from the title insurance
company...it's a bit greek to me...mind reading it and giving your opinion on
it?
Thanks,"
Good morning:
One of our options under the policy in the case of a
claim is to determine what the loss would be, whether or not we believe there
is coverage. In this case, here is an
easement across most of the paved area on Lot 8 so it appears to be a trespass,
not a title issue. Also, because there
does not appear to be a recorded easement for the storm drain that allegedly
runs through Lot 9, it too would appear to be a trespass and not a title issue.
Under the policy, the measure of loss is the difference, if any, in the value of the property with and without the issues in question. Although we do not concede that there are claims or rights to the property that were not excepted from coverage, we have opted to determine the diminution in value attributable to the paved driveway and the underground storm drain. If you have any ideas of what you believe the loss to be, then please let me know. Otherwise, I will retain an appraiser to evaluate the property and provide a value.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)