In a few days it will be four years ago that I spoke to my
first Claims Counsel with Fidelity National Title Insurance Company in Walnut
Creek, California. In early October 2008 a Title Officer with Fidelity wrote, “[u]pon the title
personnel’s review of the easement you inquired about that was shown as Parcels
Two, Three, Four and Five of the Grant Deed recorded 4/25/2003, Instrument no. XXXXXXXXX does not appear to extend
across assessor’s parcel no XX-XXX-XX
for that reason it has been determined that a claim should be opened and the
matter has been turned over to claims department counsel.” And this Title Officer opened the claim on my
behalf.
Four years, five Claims Counsels in Walnut Creek, Chicago
and Omaha and countless written pages, the claim is now a lawsuit back with the
Walnut Creek Office of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company as it was
determined that a claim for the loss of an almost mile long easement to an 80
acre parcel with views of the Napa Valley had a value of $0 – nada – nothing by an appraiser from Boise Idaho.
Friday was supposed to be the deposition of the Fidelity National
Title Insurance Company Officer and Vice President who verified under penalty
of perjury that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company’s Verified Answer to
Third Amended Complaint was true and correct.
Leaving home at 6:30 am for a 9:00 am deposition, I arrived to the
videographer packing up to leave. The
Counsel for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company had been on vacation. He had not communicated with my attorney that
the deposition could not occur today. And
this Vice President was reported to be an underwriter and not familiar with the
claim. And that the deposition that was
to occur on Monday would also be cancelled due to the person who was supposed to be deposed not being available.
Over the next couple of days I will digress to the beginning
of the story……………………
No comments:
Post a Comment