I would never use Fidelity National Title Insurance Company to protect my real estate. A claim was filed with Fidelity for me by their Title Officer for the loss of a mile long easement to 80 acres with views of the famous Napa Valley in California. Fidelity valued the loss at $0 by a Boise Idaho appraiser. After suing Fidelity I was forced to settle for a fraction of the loss. I question whether Fidelity National Title Insurance Company acted in Good Faith in the handling of my claim.
Friday, February 15, 2013
So which of the FNF precepts do I find interesting???
Per the letter from Mr. Foley
The six precepts are:
Autonomy and Entrepreneurship
Bias for Action
Customer-Oriented and Motivated
Minimize Bureaucracy
Employee Ownership
Highest Standard of Conduct
Obviously:
Customer-Oriented and Motivated
The last thing that I felt was that anyone employed by Fidelity was Customer-Oriented and Motivated. As a matter of fact I felt that not only was I not at the bottom of the totem pole - I felt like I was not even on it!!!
Employee Ownership
Well I have discussed this before and will again in the next post. I felt that there was definitely a different motivation in handling my claim other than me - the customer. I suspect it had to do with Employee Ownership.
Highest Standard of Conduct
Well I do not feel that anyone I dealt with after the filing of the claim was performing with the Highest Standard of Conduct at least in regards to me - the customer.
So forgive me if I find these precepts as they relate to FNF employees amusing (and everyone I dealt with from my escrow officer through the last Fidelity attorneys, Richard McNeely and Edward Kunnes had email address that ended identically with "@fnf.com" so I am assuming hopefully correctly that they were all FNF employees.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment